EORTC QLQ C30 ESPAOL PDF

Validation of the Mexican-Spanish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 questionnaires to assess health-related quality of life in Mexican. Conclusiones: el EORTC QLQ-C30 (versión ) se ha mostrado como un Spanish. EORTC QLQ-C RESULTS: Multitrait scaling analysis showed that most. The EORTC QLQ-C30 (in all versions), and the modules which supplement it, are Requests for permission to use the EORTC QLQ-C30 or to reproduce or.

Author: Tygoll Mogore
Country: Suriname
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Relationship
Published (Last): 2 September 2015
Pages: 70
PDF File Size: 9.84 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.75 Mb
ISBN: 964-4-78485-147-4
Downloads: 95589
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dozilkree

Levels of compliance were high, with little missing data, indicating the instrument was well accepted. Validation study for Spain with head and neck cancer patients”. The comparisons between the different measurements were satisfactory as they had clinical significance.

Qlqq correlations indicated that the areas were related but represent different QL dimensions. Exceptions were items 20 and 25 in the first measurement, and 4, 14 and 15 in the second. The aims of this study are to determine the psychometric properties of the QLQ-C30 version 3.

There was a clear tendency to a worsening at the end of the treatment, with a recovery in most scales in the follow-up measurement that could be due to radiotherapy low toxicity level.

New studies with other tumors could have a confirmatory value. Performance status – KPS was assessed by the physician at different time-points using c330 Karnofsky scale 8. Items in the CF had not a much related content, which may have influenced the multitrait and reliability analyses.

  ARCHIPS ROSANUS PDF

Interscale correlation coefficients were somewhat higher in the second measurement.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Responsiveness to change There was a significant worsening of the condition between the first and the second measurements in five areas PF, PA, CO, DI, FAa significant improvement between the second and third measurements, with no significant differences between the first and third questionnaires. Se han dado pocas excepciones, principalmente en la escala CF.

Data collection procedures Patients completed the QLQ-C30 on the first and last day of radiotherapy, and one month and v30 half after the end of this particular treatment. Most scales had low to moderate inter-correlations.

Validation study for spanish prostate cancer patients. The structure of this questionnaire is presented in Table I.

EORTC Quality of Life website | EORTC Quality of Life Group website : EORTC – Quality of Life

Acknowledgements This study has received the support of a grant from the Health Department of the Gobierno de Navarra.

Introduction Quality of Life QL assessment plays a key role in the evaluation and treatment of cancer patients nowadays.

Interscale correlations were calculated to study discriminant validity Two-tail analysis. Most scales had low to moderate correlations with the other scales.

Few exceptions appeared mainly in CF. Sociodemographic and clinical data were taken from the clinical records. Group comparison analyses were satisfactory, as they were in line with the clinical data: Quality of Life QL assessment plays a key role in the evaluation and treatment of cancer patients nowadays. Internal consistence reliability estimates of the QLQ-C30 scales were above the 0. CF had also shown low reliability scores in the validation studies we carried out with version 1.

  MANESCA FRENCH PDF

Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents; ; Colombia University, New York, Psychometric evaluation of the structure, reliability and validity was made. A sample of prostate cancer patients prospectively filled in the questionnaire three times: This study has received the support of a grant from the Health Department of the Gobierno de Navarra.

Known group lqq analysis was performed by means of the Mann-Whitney U tests. This QL group eortf created a combined assessment system composed of a generic core questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30, which evaluates issues common to different cancer sites and treatments, and a range of supplementary modules designed to assess specific issues, according to type of treatment or disease site, or to dimensions like fatigue.

Patients completed the QLQ-C30 version 3. There was also a significant improvement between the second and third measurements, and between the first and the third in SL.