Copenhagen has ratings and reviews. Manny said: So what did you think?- I liked it! A lot of really interesting historical stuff about the. More information has come to light, since Michael Frayn’s play premiered in , about its subject: the ruptured friendship between the. New Vic, Newcastle-under-LymeMichael Frayn’s career-high play challenges classical drama as surely as its two scientist lead characters do.

Author: Malkree Faunris
Country: Colombia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Marketing
Published (Last): 15 September 2006
Pages: 370
PDF File Size: 15.70 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.97 Mb
ISBN: 886-3-24030-813-9
Downloads: 4878
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gazragore

In the letter, Heisenberg described how he had come to Copenhagen to discuss with Bohr copenhaten moral objections toward scientists working on nuclear weapons, but how he had failed to say this clearly before the conversation came to a halt.


The best play I’ve seen. Allied troops disassembling the German experimental research reactor at Haigerloch, as part of the Alsos mission. February Learn how and when to remove this template message. They knew what plutonium was. If your dramatised version of a historical event is less interesting, less juicy, than the actual event, then you’ve completely failed in trying to turn it into art. This page was last edited on 13 Decemberat Niels and Margrethe Bohr, on the motorcycle of George Gamow, Time and space do not exist.

Paperbackpages. In most dramatic works where the characters are dopenhagen on real people, there is a point at which the character deviates from the real person. But Heisenberg was a patriotic German who was now working, probably with some reluctance, under the Nazis; Bohr, rrayn was copnehagen, would soon be forced to flee Denmark.

Frayn’s wife is Claire Tomalin, the biographer and literary journalist. Indeed, Bohr’s letters note that Heisenberg spoke “in vague terms”, from which Bohr was only able to form an “impression” about Heisenberg’s efforts. These are all traits copenhagenn the artistic style known as Expressionism.


As for Heisenberg, the fratn who could have built the bomb but somehow failed to, his dilemma is at the heart of the play’s conflict. For an arts graduate.

This is I feel the premise and emotion garnered from this work. The amount of vitriol was impressive. Bohr had concluded that they would have both drowned had he jumped in to save his son, and this presents an idea of futile heroics, particularly with reference to Heisenberg and fgayn should happen if he were to resist Hitler’s rule.

What do historians think, in the end, that Heisenberg was trying to do when he visited his mentor Niels Bohr in occupied Copenhagen in the fall of ? Jan 30, R rated it really liked it Shelves: Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. There are no discussion topics on this book yet. First produced at copennhagen National Theatre inCopenhagen may be Frayn’s dramatic masterpiece, though it’s a difficult play to revive and, it must be said, a long and thorny piece to watch.

Heisenberg’s career was founded on uncertainty — he made a principle of it, and Michael Frayn’s play is a dramatic example of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle in action. I was wondering if I could kiss you. It was very moving. View all 4 comments.

Copenhagen review – Michael Frayn’s masterwork still blazes with mystery

Though a writer from Physics World hailed it as “brilliant theatre ,” a Charles Spencer, of the Daily Telegraphwrote, “I felt that my brain was being stretched to breaking point—well beyond breaking point, in fact. Open Preview See a Problem? InGerman physicist Werner Heisenberg made a clandestine trip to have dinner with his friend, Danish physicist Niels Bohr, and his wife, Margrethe. One rooted in a controversial act of war, the other in a controversial piece of theatre.

But in his Tony Award-winning play Copenhagen, Michael Frayn shows us that these men were passionate, philosophical, and all too human, even though one of the three historical figures in his drama, Werner Heisenberg, was the head of the Nazis’ effort to develop a nuclear weapon. There were those within the German program which was not one single program in any case, but several different groups who knew that the critical mass of enriched uranium would be fairly low German Army Ordnance thought in that between kg of U would give you a bomb, which is a spot-on estimate.


Copenhagen (play) – Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Heisenberg historians remain divided over their own interpretations of the event.

It wasn’t that hard to follow. They sit and talk, over and over again trying to reconstruct what happened, but can’t agree as Bohr wrote to Heisenberg in copenhqgen letter he never sent: This principle is applied xopenhagen nuclear weaponrysuggesting that nations will act differently when they think that an opponent can produce nuclear arms, whether or not the opponent can.

A writer for The Commonweal commented on the Broadway premiere, saying that “the play’s relentless cerebral forays can If anything, Copenhagen really does hammer home the idea of the inseparability of the natural world from the personal, of theoretical physics from metaphysics. This blog began in Copenhagen, Retrieved 3 Novemberhttp: This talk probably started with my copenhageh as to whether or not it was right for physicists to devote themselves in wartime to the uranium problem — as there was the possibility that progress in this sphere could lead to grave consequences in the technique of the war.